New 9/11 truth documentary among ‘most watched’ on PBS this week

Victoria N. Alexander

“9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out” is getting public attention and casting doubt on the scientific validity of the U.S. government’s investigation into the WTC tragedy. PBS is the first major network to air the program.

Just days away from the 11th anniversary of the World Trade Center tragedy and months away from the U.S. presidential election, a game-changing 9/11 documentary is ranking number three among “most watched” documentaries on PBS and number one among “most shared.” Available for free online August 18th – September 4th, the documentary could have a significant effect on public opinion. Both the Republicans and Democrats, as equally staunch defenders of the official story, stand to be affected if the public’s suspicion of government corruption grows deeper.

An earlier report on Digital Journal found that the claims made in the documentary can be verified by reading the government reports themselves. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), the government agency charged with the investigation, did not provide any data — no measurements or estimates — of the mass or energy that would be required to bring down the buildings in about ten seconds. Normally a scientific report would present all the data that is used to construct a theory. The omission of data is a red flag to any one familiar with scientific procedure. It appears that the investigators may have intentionally produced reports that the scientific community would reject.

Read more


2 Responses

  1. I don’t watch the lobotomy box. I haven’t owned one in 20 years. The sheeple are sooo stupid they have to see it on TV to believe it. So maybe, just maybe some of them will wake up. I am not hopeful. Most won’t let reality and facts interfere with their world view….

  2. I was never comfortable believing the official cover up.

    But I must say this new alternative cover up suits me just great! Now I get to blame the government, but without having to deal with any of that hard-to-explain physical evidence.

    Evidence such as …..the lack of a seismic signal, the debris pile less than the height of the lobby, the 14 survivors in the core of WTC1 who were not burned or squished or buried under 500,000 tons of tower, the ambulance parked outside which was not buried or even dented, the 1400 ‘toasted’ cars some of which were parked over half a mile away, the missing marble facades of neighbouring buildings, the outer steel sections which are clearly turning to dust in mid air, the unburned paper everywhere (thermite was used in WW2 to quickly burn secret documents in the event of capture by the enemy), the lack of steel and concrete, the missing file cabinets, toilets, carpets, furniture, steel, concrete, glass, generators, wiring, water tanks, phones, computers, staplers, vending machines etc, the distinct absence of any kind of cooled ‘plug’ of once molten metal found in the basements (where did all that *alleged* molten metal go?), the absence of any bright flashes or heat during the towers’ demise (thermite would have lit up the towers like giant sparklers and created a scolding dust cloud – yet there was no light and the dust cloud was not hot and didn’t burn anyone)…. etc

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: